Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
smarandachean_transdiciplinarity [2007-06-26 10:25] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | smarandachean_transdiciplinarity [2019-07-17 08:32] (current) – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
(still needs wikification// | (still needs wikification// | ||
- | < | ||
- | |||
- | A) Definition: | ||
- | | ||
- | uncommon entities: | ||
- | empty set, even if they are disjoint. | ||
- | |||
- | B) Multi-Structure and Multi-Space: | ||
- | |||
- | Let S1 and S2 be two distinct structures, induced by the | ||
- | group of laws L which verify the axiom groups A1 and A2 | ||
- | respectively, | ||
- | One says that the set M, endowed with the properties: | ||
- | a) M has an S1-structure, | ||
- | b) there is a proper subset P (different from the empty set ü, | ||
- | from the unitary element with respect to S2, and from M) of the | ||
- | initial set M which has an S2-structure, | ||
- | c) M doesn' | ||
- | is called an S1-structure with respect to S2-structure. | ||
- | |||
- | Let S1, S2, ..., Sk be distinct space-structures. | ||
- | We define the Multi-Space (or k-Structured Space) as a set M such | ||
- | that for each structure Si, 1 <= i <= k, there is a proper | ||
- | (different from the empty set, from the unitary element with respect to Si, | ||
- | and from M) subset Mi of it which has that structure. | ||
- | M2, ..., Mk proper subsets are different two by two. | ||
- | (F.Smarandache, | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | Field, Multi-Lattice, | ||
- | which may be generalized to Infinite-Structured-Space, | ||
- | Infinite-Structured-Group, | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | C) Psychomathematics: | ||
- | A discipline which studies psychological processes in connection | ||
- | with mathematics. | ||
- | |||
- | D) Mathematical Modeling of Psychological Processes: | ||
- | |||
- | a) Improvement of Weber' | ||
- | stimuli. | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | spiritual) and an & | ||
- | states. | ||
- | Then , how can we mix an & | ||
- | something in between: s% spiritual and m% material (s+m = 100)? | ||
- | [kind of chemical alloy]. | ||
- | Or, as Boethius, a founder of scholasticism, | ||
- | to reason" | ||
- | rational judgement. | ||
- | |||
- | For example & | ||
- | Fechner, who inaugurated the experimental psychology, obsessed | ||
- | with this problem, advanced the theory that every object is both | ||
- | mental and physical (psychophysics). | ||
- | Fechner' | ||
- | and k a constant, | ||
- | which is derived from Weber' | ||
- | increment of stimulus just detectable, | ||
- | should be improved, because the function log R is indefinitely | ||
- | increasing as R ---> ü, to | ||
- | |||
- | ln R | ||
- | S(R) = k -------, for R in [Rm, RM], | ||
- | ln RM | ||
- | and | ||
- | |||
- | S(R) = 0, for R in [0, Rm) union with (RM, ü), | ||
- | |||
- | where k is a positive constant depending on three parameters: | ||
- | individual being, type of sensation, and the kind of stimulus, | ||
- | and Rm, RM represent the minimum and maximum stimulus magnitude | ||
- | respectively perceptible by the subject, | ||
- | the second one bringing about the death of sensation. | ||
- | Fechner' | ||
- | power law R = kS^n, with n depending on the kind of stimulus, were | ||
- | upper unbounded, while the beings are surely limited in | ||
- | perception. | ||
- | S: [0, ü) ---> {0} union with [Sm, SM], with Sm, SM the minimum | ||
- | and maximum perceptible sensation respectively. | ||
- | Of course Rm > 1, S(Rm) = Sm, and S(RM) = SM = k. | ||
- | |||
- | Ln, increasing faster, replaces log because the sensation is more | ||
- | rapidly increasing at the beginning, and later going on much | ||
- | slower. | ||
- | At R = RM, S attaints its maximum, beyond whom it becomes flat | ||
- | again, falling to zero. | ||
- | The beings have a low and high threshold respectively, | ||
- | where they may feel a sensation. | ||
- | |||
- | Graph of Fechner' | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | /\ | ||
- | S | | ||
- | | | ||
- | | ||
- | SM | . | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | Sm | | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | 0 Rm | ||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | For example in acoustics: | ||
- | beginning and, if it constantly keeps enlarging its intensity, at | ||
- | a given moment we hear it, and for a while its loudness increases | ||
- | in our ears, until the number of decibels - getting bigger than | ||
- | our possibility of hearing - breaks our eardrums... | ||
- | hear anything anymore, our sensation died... | ||
- | |||
- | Now, if at a given moment t0 the stimulus R remains constant | ||
- | equal to R0 (between the conscious limits of the being, for a | ||
- | long period of time t), and the sensation S(R0) = c, then we get | ||
- | the following formulas: | ||
- | In the case when the stimulus in not physically or | ||
- | physiologically damaging the individual being: | ||
- | Sdec(t) = c log1/ | ||
- | for 0 <= t <= exp(-Sm/ | ||
- | which is a decreasing function; | ||
- | In the case when the stimulus is hurting the individual being: | ||
- | Sinc(t) = c ln(t+e), for 0 <= t <= exp(SM/ | ||
- | which is an increasing function until the sensation reaches its | ||
- | upper bound; | ||
- | where c, as a constant, depends on individual being, type of | ||
- | sensation, and kind of stimulus. | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | ü If a prisoner feels a constant smell in his closed room for | ||
- | days and days, isolated from the exterior, and he doesn' | ||
- | outside to change the environment, | ||
- | less and after a critical moment he becomes inured to the smell | ||
- | and do not feel it anymore - | ||
- | thus the sensation disappears under the low perceptible limit. | ||
- | ü If a water drop licks constantly, at the same interval of time, | ||
- | with the same intensity, on the head of a prisoner tied to a | ||
- | pillar, the prisoner after a while will feel the water drop | ||
- | heavier and heavier, will mentally get ill and out of his mind, | ||
- | and will even physically die - | ||
- | therefore again disappears the sensation, but above the high | ||
- | limit. | ||
- | ü If one permanently plays the same song for days and days to a | ||
- | person enclosed in a room without any other noise from outside, | ||
- | that person will be driven crazy, even psychologically die, and | ||
- | the sensation will disappear. | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | defined on [Rm, RM], where k is a constant depending on individual | ||
- | being, type of sensation, and kind of stimulus, | ||
- | due to the fact that the relative threshold Delta R increases slower | ||
- | with respect to R. | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | b) Synonymity Test, | ||
- | similar to, and an extension of, the antonym test in psychology, | ||
- | would be a verbal test where the subject must supply as many as | ||
- | possible synonyms of a given word within a as short as possible | ||
- | period of time. | ||
- | How to measure it? | ||
- | The spectrum of supplied synonyms (s), within the measured period | ||
- | of time (t), shows the subject' | ||
- | s/t. | ||
- | |||
- | E) Psychoneutrosophy: | ||
- | Psychology of neutral thought, action, behavior, sensation, | ||
- | perception, etc. This is a hybrid field deriving from | ||
- | psychology, philosophy, economics, theology, etc. | ||
- | For example, to find the psychological causes and effects of | ||
- | individuals supporting neutral ideologies (neither capitalists, | ||
- | nor communists), | ||
- | etc. | ||
- | |||
- | F) Socioneutrosophy: | ||
- | Sociology of neutralities. | ||
- | For example the sociological phenomena and reasons which | ||
- | determine a country or group of people or class to remain neuter | ||
- | in a military, political, ideological, | ||
- | scientific, economical, etc. international or internal war | ||
- | (dispute). | ||
- | |||
- | G) Econoneutrosophy: | ||
- | Economics of non-profit organizations, | ||
- | philanthropic associations, | ||
- | artistic or scientific societies, etc. | ||
- | How they function, how they survive, who benefits and who loses, | ||
- | why are they necessary, how they improve, how they interact with | ||
- | for-profit companies. | ||
- | |||
- | H) New Types of Philosophies: | ||
- | |||
- | a) Object Philosophy: | ||
- | flower, a bird flying, etc. any object are all ideas, or inspire | ||
- | ideas - which are not necessarily to be written down on the paper | ||
- | because they would lose their naturalness and their essence would | ||
- | be distorted. | ||
- | The philosophy should consequently have a universal language, not | ||
- | clinged to a specific language (how to translate, for example, | ||
- | Heidegger' | ||
- | or word?!). | ||
- | |||
- | b) Concrete Philosophy: | ||
- | two-dimensional picture are all ideas and inspire ideas. | ||
- | |||
- | c) Sonorous Philosophy: | ||
- | sound, any noise are all ideas, or inspire ideas - because they | ||
- | directly work with our unconsciousness. | ||
- | |||
- | d) Fuzzy Philosophy: | ||
- | and & | ||
- | certain probability) to both of them, even to & | ||
- | Like the clouds in the sky. | ||
- | An element e belongs 70% to & | ||
- | organic, e belongs 70% to & | ||
- | A> for example. | ||
- | The di-chotomy between & | ||
- | trichotomy (& | ||
- | and by generalization in a similar way, with plurichotomy onward | ||
- | to transchotomy [ü-chotomy] (continuum-power shades among & | ||
- | & | ||
- | And, when the probability is involved, fuzzy-chotomy, | ||
- | neutro-chotomy. | ||
- | d) Applied Philosophy: | ||
- | proverbs, aphorisms, maxims, fables, stories) used in our every | ||
- | day's life. | ||
- | |||
- | e) Experimental Philosophy: | ||
- | of strange, bizarre ideas. | ||
- | |||
- | f) Futurist Philosophy: | ||
- | computers using artificial intelligence; | ||
- | this is the philosophy of tomorrow. | ||
- | |||
- | g) The main thesis of the Fonfoist Philosophy is: | ||
- | A 31dh972`4t` ; Re euhwu KK uoe ,,T iehewllue;n 8 'ei e | ||
- | pE ecb;w | ehe eIc w' | ||
- | 3[S 871]3j kjNec743 cwe]9-3 ]w,rU '3m 0fi re4-. | ||
- | This is because philosophy is a tautology, and every | ||
- | sentence is formally true in a certain referential system. | ||
- | senseless proposition has a sense. | ||
- | Then, what's the meaning of this thesis? | ||
- | (F. Smarandache, | ||
- | |||
- | h) Nonphilosophy: | ||
- | To make philosophy by not doing any philosophy at all! | ||
- | Like a mutism. | ||
- | Everything may mean philosophy: | ||
- | letters), any scientific sign or expression displayed on the | ||
- | page... | ||
- | A poem is a philosophical system. | ||
- | formula, a mathematical equation too. | ||
- | For example, a blank page also means an idea, a natural | ||
- | phenomenon as well. | ||
- | Due to the fact that they all make you reflect, meditate, think. | ||
- | This nonphilosophy becomes, paradoxically, | ||
- | philosophy! | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | I) New Types of Philosophical Movements: | ||
- | |||
- | a) Revisionism: | ||
- | phenomena, schools, thinkers and rewrite the philosophy as a | ||
- | cumulus of summum bonum. | ||
- | |||
- | b) Inspirationalism: | ||
- | contemporaries for inspiration to get your own research methods | ||
- | and original system. | ||
- | |||
- | c) Recurrentism: | ||
- | determines another idea, like an infinite recurrent sequence. | ||
- | |||
- | d) Sophisticalism: | ||
- | abstract, general... the better! | ||
- | [This is the style of some people...] | ||
- | |||
- | e) Rejectivism: | ||
- | mixed with conscious) will to a priori-ly repel somebody else's | ||
- | system, and totally or partially replace it with yours own. | ||
- | |||
- | f) Paradoxism: | ||
- | same time. | ||
- | Law of the paradoxism: | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | Literature: | ||
- | |||
- | a) An Avant-garde Literary Movement, the Paradoxism | ||
- | (which uses mathematical paradoxes in artistic creations): | ||
- | the study of paradoxes as a discipline apart and their use in | ||
- | other fields. | ||
- | |||
- | - The Basic Thesis of the Paradoxism: | ||
- | everything has a meaning and a non-meaning | ||
- | in a harmony each other. | ||
- | |||
- | - The Essence of the Paradoxism: | ||
- | a) the sense has a non-sense, | ||
- | and reciprocaliy | ||
- | b) the non-sense has a sense. | ||
- | |||
- | - The Delimitation from Other Avant-gardes: | ||
- | -the paradoxism has a significance, | ||
- | while the dadaism, the lettrism, the absurd movement do not; | ||
- | -the paradoxism especially reveals the contradictions, | ||
- | the anti-nomies, | ||
- | the antagonism, the non-conformism, | ||
- | | ||
- | while the futurism, cubism, abstractism and all other | ||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | - The Directions of the Paradoxism: | ||
- | -to use science methods (especially algoritms) for | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | -to create contradictory literary and artistic works | ||
- | in scientific spaces (using scientific: symbols, | ||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | b) New Types of ' | ||
- | (using paradoxes and tautologies): | ||
- | - Paradoxist Distich = a two-line poem such that the second one | ||
- | contradicts the first, but together they form a unitary meaning | ||
- | defining (or making connection with) the title. | ||
- | - Tautological Distich = an apparently redundant two-line poem, | ||
- | but together the redundant lines give a deeper meaning to the | ||
- | whole poem defining (or making connection with) the title. | ||
- | - Dualist Distich | ||
- | - Paradoxist Tertian | ||
- | - Tautological Tertian | ||
- | - Paradoxist Quatrain | ||
- | - Tautological Quatrain | ||
- | - Fractal Poem. | ||
- | |||
- | c) New Types of Short Story: | ||
- | - Syllogistic Short Story | ||
- | - Circular Short Story | ||
- | (F.Smarandache, | ||
- | |||
- | d) New Types of Drama: | ||
- | - Neutrosophic Drama | ||
- | - Sophistic Drama | ||
- | - Combinatory Drama = a drama whose scenes are permuted and | ||
- | combined in so many ways producing over a billion of billions of | ||
- | different dramas! | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | stories, and of dramas. | ||
- | |||
- | </ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | A) Definition: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | uncommon entities: | ||
+ | empty set, even if they are disjoint. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | B) Multi-Structure and Multi-Space: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Let S1 and S2 be two distinct structures, induced by the | ||
+ | group of laws L which verify the axiom groups A1 and A2 | ||
+ | respectively, | ||
+ | One says that the set M, endowed with the properties: | ||
+ | a) M has an S1-structure, | ||
+ | b) there is a proper subset P (different from the empty set ü, | ||
+ | from the unitary element with respect to S2, and from M) of the | ||
+ | initial set M which has an S2-structure, | ||
+ | c) M doesn' | ||
+ | is called an S1-structure with respect to S2-structure. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Let S1, S2, ..., Sk be distinct space-structures. | ||
+ | We define the Multi-Space (or k-Structured Space) as a set M such | ||
+ | that for each structure Si, 1 <= i <= k, there is a proper | ||
+ | (different from the empty set, from the unitary element with respect to Si, | ||
+ | and from M) subset Mi of it which has that structure. | ||
+ | M2, ..., Mk proper subsets are different two by two. | ||
+ | (F.Smarandache, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Field, Multi-Lattice, | ||
+ | which may be generalized to Infinite-Structured-Space, | ||
+ | Infinite-Structured-Group, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | C) Psychomathematics: | ||
+ | A discipline which studies psychological processes in connection | ||
+ | with mathematics. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | D) Mathematical Modeling of Psychological Processes: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | a) Improvement of Weber' | ||
+ | stimuli. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | spiritual) and an & | ||
+ | states. | ||
+ | Then , how can we mix an & | ||
+ | something in between: s% spiritual and m% material (s+m = 100)? | ||
+ | [kind of chemical alloy]. | ||
+ | Or, as Boethius, a founder of scholasticism, | ||
+ | to reason" | ||
+ | rational judgement. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | For example & | ||
+ | Fechner, who inaugurated the experimental psychology, obsessed | ||
+ | with this problem, advanced the theory that every object is both | ||
+ | mental and physical (psychophysics). | ||
+ | Fechner' | ||
+ | and k a constant, | ||
+ | which is derived from Weber' | ||
+ | increment of stimulus just detectable, | ||
+ | should be improved, because the function log R is indefinitely | ||
+ | increasing as R ---> ü, to | ||
+ | | ||
+ | ln R | ||
+ | S(R) = k -------, for R in [Rm, RM], | ||
+ | ln RM | ||
+ | and | ||
+ | | ||
+ | S(R) = 0, for R in [0, Rm) union with (RM, ü), | ||
+ | | ||
+ | where k is a positive constant depending on three parameters: | ||
+ | individual being, type of sensation, and the kind of stimulus, | ||
+ | and Rm, RM represent the minimum and maximum stimulus magnitude | ||
+ | respectively perceptible by the subject, | ||
+ | the second one bringing about the death of sensation. | ||
+ | Fechner' | ||
+ | power law R = kS^n, with n depending on the kind of stimulus, were | ||
+ | upper unbounded, while the beings are surely limited in | ||
+ | perception. | ||
+ | S: [0, ü) ---> {0} union with [Sm, SM], with Sm, SM the minimum | ||
+ | and maximum perceptible sensation respectively. | ||
+ | Of course Rm > 1, S(Rm) = Sm, and S(RM) = SM = k. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Ln, increasing faster, replaces log because the sensation is more | ||
+ | rapidly increasing at the beginning, and later going on much | ||
+ | slower. | ||
+ | At R = RM, S attaints its maximum, beyond whom it becomes flat | ||
+ | again, falling to zero. | ||
+ | The beings have a low and high threshold respectively, | ||
+ | where they may feel a sensation. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Graph of Fechner' | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | /\ | ||
+ | S | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | SM | . | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Sm | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | 0 Rm | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | For example in acoustics: | ||
+ | beginning and, if it constantly keeps enlarging its intensity, at | ||
+ | a given moment we hear it, and for a while its loudness increases | ||
+ | in our ears, until the number of decibels - getting bigger than | ||
+ | our possibility of hearing - breaks our eardrums... | ||
+ | hear anything anymore, our sensation died... | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Now, if at a given moment t0 the stimulus R remains constant | ||
+ | equal to R0 (between the conscious limits of the being, for a | ||
+ | long period of time t), and the sensation S(R0) = c, then we get | ||
+ | the following formulas: | ||
+ | In the case when the stimulus in not physically or | ||
+ | physiologically damaging the individual being: | ||
+ | Sdec(t) = c log1/ | ||
+ | for 0 <= t <= exp(-Sm/ | ||
+ | which is a decreasing function; | ||
+ | In the case when the stimulus is hurting the individual being: | ||
+ | Sinc(t) = c ln(t+e), for 0 <= t <= exp(SM/ | ||
+ | which is an increasing function until the sensation reaches its | ||
+ | upper bound; | ||
+ | where c, as a constant, depends on individual being, type of | ||
+ | sensation, and kind of stimulus. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | ü If a prisoner feels a constant smell in his closed room for | ||
+ | days and days, isolated from the exterior, and he doesn' | ||
+ | outside to change the environment, | ||
+ | less and after a critical moment he becomes inured to the smell | ||
+ | and do not feel it anymore - | ||
+ | thus the sensation disappears under the low perceptible limit. | ||
+ | ü If a water drop licks constantly, at the same interval of time, | ||
+ | with the same intensity, on the head of a prisoner tied to a | ||
+ | pillar, the prisoner after a while will feel the water drop | ||
+ | heavier and heavier, will mentally get ill and out of his mind, | ||
+ | and will even physically die - | ||
+ | therefore again disappears the sensation, but above the high | ||
+ | limit. | ||
+ | ü If one permanently plays the same song for days and days to a | ||
+ | person enclosed in a room without any other noise from outside, | ||
+ | that person will be driven crazy, even psychologically die, and | ||
+ | the sensation will disappear. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | defined on [Rm, RM], where k is a constant depending on individual | ||
+ | being, type of sensation, and kind of stimulus, | ||
+ | due to the fact that the relative threshold Delta R increases slower | ||
+ | with respect to R. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | b) Synonymity Test, | ||
+ | similar to, and an extension of, the antonym test in psychology, | ||
+ | would be a verbal test where the subject must supply as many as | ||
+ | possible synonyms of a given word within a as short as possible | ||
+ | period of time. | ||
+ | How to measure it? | ||
+ | The spectrum of supplied synonyms (s), within the measured period | ||
+ | of time (t), shows the subject' | ||
+ | s/t. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | E) Psychoneutrosophy: | ||
+ | Psychology of neutral thought, action, behavior, sensation, | ||
+ | perception, etc. This is a hybrid field deriving from | ||
+ | psychology, philosophy, economics, theology, etc. | ||
+ | For example, to find the psychological causes and effects of | ||
+ | individuals supporting neutral ideologies (neither capitalists, | ||
+ | nor communists), | ||
+ | etc. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | F) Socioneutrosophy: | ||
+ | Sociology of neutralities. | ||
+ | For example the sociological phenomena and reasons which | ||
+ | determine a country or group of people or class to remain neuter | ||
+ | in a military, political, ideological, | ||
+ | scientific, economical, etc. international or internal war | ||
+ | (dispute). | ||
+ | | ||
+ | G) Econoneutrosophy: | ||
+ | Economics of non-profit organizations, | ||
+ | philanthropic associations, | ||
+ | artistic or scientific societies, etc. | ||
+ | How they function, how they survive, who benefits and who loses, | ||
+ | why are they necessary, how they improve, how they interact with | ||
+ | for-profit companies. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | H) New Types of Philosophies: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | a) Object Philosophy: | ||
+ | flower, a bird flying, etc. any object are all ideas, or inspire | ||
+ | ideas - which are not necessarily to be written down on the paper | ||
+ | because they would lose their naturalness and their essence would | ||
+ | be distorted. | ||
+ | The philosophy should consequently have a universal language, not | ||
+ | clinged to a specific language (how to translate, for example, | ||
+ | Heidegger' | ||
+ | or word?!). | ||
+ | | ||
+ | b) Concrete Philosophy: | ||
+ | two-dimensional picture are all ideas and inspire ideas. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | c) Sonorous Philosophy: | ||
+ | sound, any noise are all ideas, or inspire ideas - because they | ||
+ | directly work with our unconsciousness. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | d) Fuzzy Philosophy: | ||
+ | and & | ||
+ | certain probability) to both of them, even to & | ||
+ | Like the clouds in the sky. | ||
+ | An element e belongs 70% to & | ||
+ | organic, e belongs 70% to & | ||
+ | A> for example. | ||
+ | The di-chotomy between & | ||
+ | trichotomy (& | ||
+ | and by generalization in a similar way, with plurichotomy onward | ||
+ | to transchotomy [ü-chotomy] (continuum-power shades among & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | And, when the probability is involved, fuzzy-chotomy, | ||
+ | neutro-chotomy. | ||
+ | d) Applied Philosophy: | ||
+ | proverbs, aphorisms, maxims, fables, stories) used in our every | ||
+ | day's life. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | e) Experimental Philosophy: | ||
+ | of strange, bizarre ideas. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | f) Futurist Philosophy: | ||
+ | computers using artificial intelligence; | ||
+ | this is the philosophy of tomorrow. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | g) The main thesis of the Fonfoist Philosophy is: | ||
+ | A 31dh972`4t` ; Re euhwu KK uoe ,,T iehewllue;n 8 'ei e | ||
+ | pE ecb;w | ehe eIc w' | ||
+ | 3[S 871]3j kjNec743 cwe]9-3 ]w,rU '3m 0fi re4-. | ||
+ | This is because philosophy is a tautology, and every | ||
+ | sentence is formally true in a certain referential system. | ||
+ | senseless proposition has a sense. | ||
+ | Then, what's the meaning of this thesis? | ||
+ | (F. Smarandache, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | h) Nonphilosophy: | ||
+ | To make philosophy by not doing any philosophy at all! | ||
+ | Like a mutism. | ||
+ | Everything may mean philosophy: | ||
+ | letters), any scientific sign or expression displayed on the | ||
+ | page... | ||
+ | A poem is a philosophical system. | ||
+ | formula, a mathematical equation too. | ||
+ | For example, a blank page also means an idea, a natural | ||
+ | phenomenon as well. | ||
+ | Due to the fact that they all make you reflect, meditate, think. | ||
+ | This nonphilosophy becomes, paradoxically, | ||
+ | philosophy! | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | I) New Types of Philosophical Movements: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | a) Revisionism: | ||
+ | phenomena, schools, thinkers and rewrite the philosophy as a | ||
+ | cumulus of summum bonum. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | b) Inspirationalism: | ||
+ | contemporaries for inspiration to get your own research methods | ||
+ | and original system. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | c) Recurrentism: | ||
+ | determines another idea, like an infinite recurrent sequence. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | d) Sophisticalism: | ||
+ | abstract, general... the better! | ||
+ | [This is the style of some people...] | ||
+ | | ||
+ | e) Rejectivism: | ||
+ | mixed with conscious) will to a priori-ly repel somebody else's | ||
+ | system, and totally or partially replace it with yours own. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | f) Paradoxism: | ||
+ | same time. | ||
+ | Law of the paradoxism: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Literature: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | a) An Avant-garde Literary Movement, the Paradoxism | ||
+ | (which uses mathematical paradoxes in artistic creations): | ||
+ | the study of paradoxes as a discipline apart and their use in | ||
+ | other fields. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | - The Basic Thesis of the Paradoxism: | ||
+ | everything has a meaning and a non-meaning | ||
+ | in a harmony each other. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | - The Essence of the Paradoxism: | ||
+ | a) the sense has a non-sense, | ||
+ | and reciprocaliy | ||
+ | b) the non-sense has a sense. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | - The Delimitation from Other Avant-gardes: | ||
+ | -the paradoxism has a significance, | ||
+ | while the dadaism, the lettrism, the absurd movement do not; | ||
+ | -the paradoxism especially reveals the contradictions, | ||
+ | the anti-nomies, | ||
+ | the antagonism, the non-conformism, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | while the futurism, cubism, abstractism and all other | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | - The Directions of the Paradoxism: | ||
+ | -to use science methods (especially algoritms) for | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | -to create contradictory literary and artistic works | ||
+ | in scientific spaces (using scientific: symbols, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | b) New Types of ' | ||
+ | (using paradoxes and tautologies): | ||
+ | - Paradoxist Distich = a two-line poem such that the second one | ||
+ | contradicts the first, but together they form a unitary meaning | ||
+ | defining (or making connection with) the title. | ||
+ | - Tautological Distich = an apparently redundant two-line poem, | ||
+ | but together the redundant lines give a deeper meaning to the | ||
+ | whole poem defining (or making connection with) the title. | ||
+ | - Dualist Distich | ||
+ | - Paradoxist Tertian | ||
+ | - Tautological Tertian | ||
+ | - Paradoxist Quatrain | ||
+ | - Tautological Quatrain | ||
+ | - Fractal Poem. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | c) New Types of Short Story: | ||
+ | - Syllogistic Short Story | ||
+ | - Circular Short Story | ||
+ | (F.Smarandache, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | d) New Types of Drama: | ||
+ | - Neutrosophic Drama | ||
+ | - Sophistic Drama | ||
+ | - Combinatory Drama = a drama whose scenes are permuted and | ||
+ | combined in so many ways producing over a billion of billions of | ||
+ | different dramas! | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | stories, and of dramas. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
[[Category Physics]] | [[Category Physics]] | ||
- | + | | |
+ |