Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- futurist_fieldguide:adaptive_action_cycle [2015-05-25 13:43] – maja
+++ futurist_fieldguide:adaptive_action_cycle [2015-05-27 08:19] – maja
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 At FoAM we used this technique very informally in short debrief sessions, as well as in formal evaluation workshops. In both cases it provided an unobtrusive framework to structure the conversations and to give the participants a feeling that the feedback is not just looking back, but it actually encourages the beginning of the next phase of a process or project.
+{{ :futurist_fieldguide:adaptive-action.png?direct&300 |}}
 === Process ===
@@ Line 12: / Line 13: @@
   * Step 1: Frame the session as a debrief that will allow the group to look back and look forward on a process they recently completed)
-  * Step 2 (optional): In a small group you can simply guide the participants through the conversation, e.g. in a [[circle]]. In a larger group it is beneficial to break out into smaller groups that either stay together for three rounds, or rotate in a [[world_cafe]] style. In case of breakouts you can ask participants to volunteer as 'table moderators' who will report at the end of the session. You can provide worksheets with the written questions and some space to write the reports.
+  * Step 2 (optional): In a small group you can simply guide the participants through the [[hosting_conversations|conversation]]. In a larger group it is beneficial to break out into smaller groups that either stay together for three rounds, or rotate in a [[world_cafe]] style. In case of breakouts you can ask participants to volunteer as 'table moderators' who will report at the end of the session. You can provide worksheets with the written questions and some space to write the reports.
   * Step 3: The first round of conversation focuses on __**What?**__: What did you do? How did you do it? How do you feel about it? What do you not know yet?